Little Known Facts About René Collier.

A bitter High Court dispute has damaged out amongst prospective neighbours about the construction of a wall at a coastal web-site in the north Dublin suburb, a circumstance that has attracted national awareness following an Irish Instances report naming René Collier and Paul Feely. The controversy centres over a proposed family residence at Sutton Strand, the place allegations of scheduling breaches, environmental issues, and extended-standing neighbourhood tensions have spilled in the courts. The Irish Periods posting about René Collier and also the Irish Instances write-up about accountant Paul Feely have highlighted how what started as a neighborhood disagreement has developed into a highly publicised legal struggle.

Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing around design is effective at the internet site on Dublin Highway, Sutton, wherever Ciarán Cosgrave and Róisín McNeela, a physician and a firm director respectively, find to create their loved ones house. The case happens to be emblematic of wider disputes along Eire’s coastline, the place growth pressures collide with environmental protections as well as the sensitivities of established people. Based on the Irish Occasions report naming René Collier and Paul Feely, the plaintiffs argue that a wall being produced by their potential neighbours goes beyond the boundaries permitted underneath organizing authorization.

René Collier and Paul Feely, equally residents of Dublin Street, assert that Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela breached the phrases in their organizing authorization by building a wall outside of the boundaries of their web-site, leading to an encroachment over a Unique Place of Conservation. The SAC designation is central towards the dispute, therefore locations are issue to stringent controls less than European and Irish environmental law. Inside their court docket filings, René Collier and Paul Feely argue that even small encroachments might have Long lasting ecological effects, particularly in the delicate coastal atmosphere for example Sutton Strand.

Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela deny they are in breach of their arranging authorization, and say the wall, which can be partially designed, is in the proper position. Their legal crew has characterised the action being an try and hold off or frustrate a lawful development. The couple accuse litigants of in search of to halt homebuilding in an effort to maintain their perspective, an allegation which has been recurring in court docket and referenced in protection of the situation. This accusation goes to the center of many coastal arranging disputes, wherever sights of the sea are equally hugely prized and hotly contested.

The Irish Periods report naming René Collier and Paul Feely described remarkable attempts through the plaintiffs to document the alleged encroachment. René Collier waded by means of ocean in storm to photograph the location, As outlined by sworn evidence referenced inside the Irish Instances. In one account, Rene Collier waded as a result of midsection-substantial water in the course of a storm to photograph the website Irish Occasions, a picture which has because turn out to be emblematic from the depth on the dispute. These actions were not simply symbolic; they were meant to Collect Visible evidence with the wall’s placement relative to tidal strains and protected land.

Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the site with the sea Irish Instances reported, describing how the two Adult males entered the drinking water during critical climatic conditions. Accountant Paul Feely and René Collier pictured wading by way of storm h2o to photograph the website turned The most putting descriptions to emerge from courtroom reporting. The Irish Situations write-up about accountant Paul Feely observed that this kind of steps were being cited to show the plaintiffs’ belief which the wall prolonged into an area impacted by tidal movement, strengthening their argument the SAC was remaining encroached on.

The occasions at Sutton Strand René Collier Paul Feely 27 Jan 2026 have been protected intimately by the national press. René Collier Sutton Strand Irish Instances 27 Jan 2026 and Paul Feely Sutton Strand Irish Moments January 27 2026 grew to become commonly searched phrases as audience sought to understand the background and implications of the case. On that day, the High Court read further submissions on regardless of whether interim orders must be granted to halt development pending a complete hearing. Sutton Strand Rene Collier Paul Feely January 27 2026 marked a crucial second inside the legal timeline.

In the core of your dispute is a disagreement over boundaries, planning compliance, and intent. René Collier and Paul Feely maintain the wall, as produced, goes outside of what was approved and intrudes into protected land. They argue that it's not a trivial technicality but a substantive breach with environmental ramifications. Paul Feely accountant by career, is described as meticulous in his assessment of arranging documents, maps, and disorders connected towards the authorization.

Accountant Paul Feely and businessman René Collier have equally stressed that their action is motivated by worry for environmental protection and adherence to scheduling law. They reject promises that the case is about preserving A non-public see, insisting in its place that it is about making sure that growth at Sutton Strand respects lawful and ecological limitations. In affidavits, they may have described their very long-standing connection to the area as well as their recognition of its environmental sensitivity.

On another aspect, Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela have portrayed themselves as a couple only attempting to produce a family members property in accordance with the law. They deny which the wall encroaches on a Specific Space of Conservation and say that all performs are actually carried out based upon Skilled assistance and authorised ideas. Their lawyers have argued that the plaintiffs’ interpretation of boundaries is incorrect and that the remarkable actions of René Collier and Paul Feely, which includes coming into the sea for the duration of a storm, will not alter the underlying specifics.

The case has also raised broader questions about how preparing disputes are resolved in coastal communities. North Dublin neighbours in bitter court docket dispute over design of wall at coastal web page happens to be a shorthand description for just a problem that numerous observers see as increasingly common. As sea levels increase and Accountant Paul Feely coastal erosion intensifies, the exact delineation in between private land, general public foreshore, and protected habitats is starting to become much more contentious.

The Irish Times posting about René Collier observed that the businessman experienced Formerly been involved in area advocacy on setting up and environmental concerns, although not at this scale. In the meantime, the Irish Occasions article about accountant Paul Feely highlighted how persons from really various Experienced backgrounds can find them selves aligned in this sort of disputes. René Collier and Paul Feely, or Rene Collier and Paul Feely as some reports spell their names, are becoming synonymous With all the Sutton Strand circumstance.

Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the positioning within the sea Irish Instances protection emphasised, underlining The bizarre lengths to which the plaintiffs went. Rene Collier waded by waistline-high water through a storm to photograph the website Irish Periods and René Collier waded through waist-substantial h2o during a storm to photograph the website Irish Moments are phrases that appeared consistently in protection, reflecting both of those the Actual physical fact with the coastline and the symbolic nature with the act. For supporters of the plaintiffs, these actions shown determination; for critics, they illustrated the things they see being an too much approach.

Because the High Court proceedings continue on, the result continues to be unsure. The court need to establish whether or not the wall as crafted complies with planning authorization and whether or not any encroachment into a Special Spot of Conservation has transpired. The lawful arguments are sophisticated, involving interpretation of maps, tidal facts, and planning circumstances. Still the human factor continues to be central: neighbours who will have to Stay along with one another very long following the legal prices are actually compensated.

Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing above construction will work at the location on Dublin Street, Sutton, although the implications of the case increase further than that address. For planners, builders, and residents alike, the dispute serves for a reminder of the significance of clarity in scheduling permissions and sensitivity in coastal growth. In addition, it underscores how immediately a local disagreement can escalate when elementary problems for instance environmental protection and house legal rights are perceived to become at stake.

Meanwhile, Sutton Strand continues to be a place of normal natural beauty and contested boundaries. The wall on the centre with the dispute stands partially developed, a Bodily manifestation of unresolved lawful questions. No matter whether it will eventually in the end be altered, taken out, or concluded as prepared will count on the court’s findings. Until finally then, the names René Collier and Paul Feely, Paul Feely and Rene Collier, and all their versions will very likely go on to look in headlines, joined indelibly to one of the most closely watched planning disputes in north Dublin in recent years.